Grand Valley Metro Council is offering free testing of property for pollution to owners in the Division Avenue Corridor.  This could save a property owner between $2000 and $40,000
This webpage is for property owners who wish to know the benefits and drawbacks of having their property tested for pollution.
This offer for free testing is limited to the Division Avenue area from Wealthy Street to 68th Street.
If you wish, Grand Valley Metro Council will test your property for free and, if it is polluted, provide a state approved plan for dealing with the pollution.
Cost:$0.00
Or
If you ever wish to sell or transfer your property, a prospective buyer would probably request an official investigation of the history of the site for indications of pollution. ( $1500-$2000, your cost)   If pollution is indicated, the buyer would want the site tested (Phase II); to determine what must be done to do with the pollution (Baseline Environmental Assessment). Owner’s cost: $15,000 to $40,000.
Cost: $2,000
To $40,000
Make YourProperty More Valuable,
Limit Liability,
Qualify for Benefits
  • Sale Ready
    Your property will be ready to sell; buyers will be confident that the property is a safe investment. Click here for more info
  • Limit Liability
    Testing can define and limit liability for past or future pollution. Click here for more info
  • Qualify for Benefits
    Understanding a property's environmental condition can open the door to additional Federal and State Brownfield redevelopment financial incentives (e.g. tax credits, abatements, grants, etc.) Click here for more info
  • What is a Brownfield?
    “Brownfields are abandoned, idle, or under-used industrial and commercial properties, often in urban areas, where expansion or redevelopment is hindered or complicated by real or perceived environmental conditions.”
    Within most of the project area, a property can also qualify as a Brownfield if it contains a blighted or functionally obsolete building.  Many commercial and most industrial properties can be considered a Brownfield.
    Examples are property once used as a dry cleaner, gas station, paint store, or for the storage of chemicals may be polluted.
  • Silver Line Bringing Higher Values?
    High speed, high capacity Bus Rapid Transit is planned for Division Avenue, linking all points to downtown Grand Rapids.  www.rapidsilverline.org
    These transit facilities typically increase the value of adjoining property considerably.  Kentwood and Wyoming have replanned the 54th Street station area and are looking at better zoning and public improvements. www.gvmc.org/landuse/charretteinfo.shtml
This Offer is Limited:
•Project May End Before December 31, 2011
•Project is Limited to the Division Avenue Corridor

Are There Risks?
The sole intent of this program is to facilitate the redevelopment of Brownfields by removing environmental uncertainty that often scares away potential buyers and developers. Neither the owner nor the purchaser needs to repay any of the Grant funds. This is not a “witch hunt” to find contaminated sites to enforce regulatory action on property owners.

That said, there is always the potential that significant, previously unknown contamination may be found during environmental due diligence activities. Unearthing extra-ordinary contamination could have negative consequences on the re-sale and/or redevelopment potential of a property. Depending on the current owner’s use of the property and whether or not they conducted any due diligence prior to acquisition, the current owner may be liable for the contamination. However, it is rare that significant, unknown contamination is found that requires costly cleanup.

Additionally, it is likely that contamination will be found eventually even if Grant funds are not used, as any new purchaser is likely to do their own due diligence activities to satisfy their lender and obtain liability protection from existing contamination. There are Brownfield incentives available to help cleanup contamination during property redevelopment. Therefore, it is in the property owner’s best interest to identify contamination now using “free” Grant funds, as opposed to spending their own money or have a potential purchaser discover the problem later.

Links:
Liability protection for new or prospective owners
or operators of contaminated property
MDNE Citizen Guide_BEAs.pdf
What You Need to Know If You Own
or Purchase Property with
Environmental Contamination
MDNE Citizen Guide_Contaminated Prop.pdf
Due Care Requirements
MDNE Citizen Guide_Due Care.pdf
Why GVMC Is Offering This Free Service
The purpose of the Brownfield Assessment Grant is to provide funding to inventory, plan, assess, conduct community outreach, and promote the redevelopment of Brownfield sites. The EPA Brownfield Grant program is a mature, proven program that has been used to assist communities, property owners, businesses, and developers acquire, redevelop, and safely re-use Brownfield properties. Since the program’s inception in the mid 1990’s, over 150 cities and counties within the State of Michigan have received and implemented Brownfield Grants. Over 1,000 Michigan properties have been assessed under the Grant program.
Ask Others
Your local business association may well include members who have used this grant.  Otherwise check out these websites:
Find Out Details or Sign Up
If you have any questions or if you are interested in using these services, contact either Garnet Johnson or Jay
Hoekstra. Additional information can be found at www.epa.gov/Brownfields.
Garnet Johnson
NTH Consultants, Ltd.
(616) 451 – 6261
Jay Hoekstra, AICP
Senior Planner, GVMC
(616) 776 – 7605

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ready For Sale
If you own property within the project area and are considering selling or leasing your property, or you are looking to acquire property within the project area, or you are otherwise involved in the sale or transaction of property within the project area (e.g. a realtor, attorney, etc.), the Grant may be able to provide significant financial and technical assistance to facilitate the transaction.
Prior to acquisition or re-use of a commercial or industrial property, a new property owner or operator is usually required by their lender to undertake “environmental due diligence.” This takes the form of a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA). The Phase I ESA consists of researching the historical and current uses of a property to determine whether there are recognized environmental conditions (RECs) associated with a property.
If potential environmental concerns are identified during the Phase I ESA, then a Phase II ESA is performed. The Phase II ESA involves collecting soil and/or groundwater samples from a property and testing them to determine if contamination is present. The environmental due diligence process allows the new owner to be protected from liability for existing contamination, if present. Without undertaking environmental due diligence, the new property owner will be taking on the liability for existing contamination. Lenders do not normally provide loans for property acquisition without documentation that due diligence was conducted. The Grant program will fund and perform the Phase I and II ESAs, with no repayment required.
Environmental due diligence costs can range from as little as $2,000 to well over $40,000. The costs depend on the size of the property, environmental concerns identified, scope of a Phase II ESA (if necessary), and planned future use of the property. These costs are often borne by the current owner or are shared between the current owner and prospective purchaser. As a result, the costs for environmental due diligence have been known to prevent the sale, acquisition, and/or re-use of a Brownfield. The Grant can remove these environmental due diligence costs and facilitate the transaction. In addition to getting the environmental due diligence out of the way, some other advantages of utilizing Grant funds are:
• Undertaking environmental due diligence can remove environmental uncertainty or stigma associated with a property.
• The Grant can be used to pay for a hazardous building materials survey (e.g. asbestos and lead-based paint), Baseline Environmental Assessment (BEA) reports, and Due Care Plans.
• Understanding a property's environmental condition can open the door to additional Federal and State Brownfield redevelopment financial incentives (e.g. tax credits, abatements, grants, etc.)
• The Grant will assist the marketing of assessed properties, including inclusion in the GVMC's powerful Regional GIS (REGIS) system.

 

 

 

Would You Be Liable For a Site’s Contamination?
Under the law, you are not liable for the cost of cleanup actions if: 
1) you are not responsible for causing a release of a hazardous. substance; and you became an owner or operator of contaminated propertybefore June 5, 1995 (or March 6, 1996 for some sites);
OR
2) you become the owner or operator of a contaminated property on or AFTER June 5, 1995 (or March 6, 1996 for some sites), and you were not responsible for the release that caused the contamination, and you conduct an adequate Baseline Environmental Assessment (BEA) for your property prior to or within 45 days of becoming the owner or operator, and you submit
the BEA to the DEQ within the required timeframes, and you disclose the results of the BEA to subsequent purchasers or transferees. (see Baseline Environmental Assessments)
More information:
What You Need to Know If You Own or Purchase Property with
Environmental Contamination
Liability protection for new or prospective owners or operators of contaminated property

 

 

 

Improved Value Along Division

High speed, high capacity Bus Rapid Transit is planned for Division Avenue, linking all points to downtown Grand Rapids.  www.rapidsilverline.org
Economic Impact

BRT systems vary in the return on investment (ROI). With some BRT projects that are more robust in scope, the return can be as high as 1,000%, for example, Cleveland's Euclid Corridor, or York, Ontario's VIVA. Kansas City's MAX has a return on investment of 300%. At the lowest end of ROI is Pittsburgh with 115%. In summary, the range of ROI varies substantially from just over 100% to over 1,000%. The average for six North American systems examined was approximately 400%.

Findings from a University of Michigan report give insight into the importance of stations and station areas. The report showed the type of running way had little impact on development. "BRT attracts real estate development because BRT stations are substantial enough and classy enough to signal to developers that the stop will become a permanent destination. When BRT systems feature such attractive stations and offer good quality service, they attract new real estate development equivalent to that attracted by rail transit."

For the Silver Line, potential station area projects along the route could provide a return on investment for the of approximately 400% — the average for the six North American systems examined above.
Kentwood, Wyoming and Gaines Township have already envisioned a new town around the 54th and 60th Street stations.   If the BRT is eventually established, perhaps 2012 or 2013, they would rezone the land to accommodate the growth.  The cities may do similar planning around other stations/
Fisher’s Station New Town

 


Grand Valley Metropolitan Council
678 Front St NW, Suite 200 • Grand Rapids, Michigan 49504
Phone: (616) 77-METRO (776-3876)• Fax: (616) 774-9292


Popular Links

 

GVMC Board Meetings can be seen on GRTV Charter Communications Channel 24 the second Tuesday and Thursday of the month at 7:00 p.m. Plus, starting November 17th on Rogueview Community TV (RCTV) Charter Communications Channel 22 on Mondays at 11:00 a.m. and 7:30 p.m.